![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
PBXtech SILVER 25+ posts
![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 30
![]() |
IP Office 2.1 and Transtalk 9040
I see some have done this already, is there a external power supply or something I need to power the radio receiver? I assume this thing gets power from the station port, but I can't get it to do it. Any suggestions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
PBXtech SILVER 25+ posts
![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 30
![]() |
Re: IP Office 2.1 and Transtalk 9040
It looks like the DRM was configured to run on a partner. It is now on an IP office, and I can't get the DRM to pwerup to change it to Magix config. PLEASE HELP
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
Sponsored links
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
PBXtech SILVER 25+ posts
![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 30
![]() |
Re: IP Office 2.1 and Transtalk 9040
I used an 1151 Power supply to power the unit, got it up, but it still doesn't work. I get either "Failed. DRM Conflict" when I try to change it to Magix. OR I get No DRM found. It will not dicover on the IP 403 port, nor any DS port on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 561
![]() |
Re: IP Office 2.1 and Transtalk 9040
There are two flavors of transtalk, one that is designed to work on the partner (or legend ATL port or magix ETR port), and one designed to work on the magix TDL port or definity DCP port (and therefore an IP Office). They contain different hardware. If your transtalk worked on a partner it will not work on the IP Office, you have to install the model designed for Magix TDL ports (44xx ports).
Peter |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
PBXtech SILVER 25+ posts
![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 30
![]() |
Re: IP Office 2.1 and Transtalk 9040
Just wanted to give an update on this:
Peter, you were absolutlety right. Swapped out the DRM to definity capable DRM and, Came right up perfectly. Only issue is that customer upgraded from old Merlin, and was ensured (by even our Avaya rep) that they they could re-use those transtalk phones. As you pointed out, that is NOT the case. You can source just the DRM though, this will get tougher since transtalk is end of life product. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 561
![]() |
Re: IP Office 2.1 and Transtalk 9040
Quote:
Peter |
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
Sponsored links
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Noise issue with 9040 using DRM-D | f3racer | Definity Servers | 3 | February 18th, 2005 11:43 PM |
| Transtalk 9040 Driving me NUTS! | Mnemonic | IP Office | 2 | September 15th, 2004 02:53 PM |
| Defective DRM for Transtalk? | devehf | Merlin Systems | 1 | April 1st, 2004 11:56 AM |
| TransTalk 9040 | rave100 | IP Office | 2 | October 28th, 2003 12:17 PM |
| IP Office Phone Manuals | hawaiian | IP Office | 3 | June 24th, 2003 01:19 PM |