PBXtech.info  
\'\'

Go Back   PBXtech.info > Avaya > Definity Servers

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 18th, 2007, 10:09 AM   #1 (permalink)
stubborne
PBXtech PLATINUM 300+ posts
 
stubborne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 401
stubborne is on a distinguished road
Faxing and IP Port Networks

CM 3.0.1 and CM 3.1.1

We've recently completed alot of equipment transition from SCC sEPN's to G650 IP Connect. The G650s, for the most part, support local dialtone and PSTN access via ISDN/PRI trunks.

I'm looking for some help supporting faxing (and modem connectivity) across these IP port networks. We've had issues and complaints of poor service since the transition. All of our IP network regions are configured with the same IP codec. Here's the codec config:

Audio Silence Frames Packet
Codec Suppression Per Pkt Size(ms)
1: G.729 n 2 20
2: G.729A n 2 20
3: G.711MU n 3 30
4:
5:
6:
7:

Media Encryption
1: none
2:
3:

Allow Direct-IP Multimedia? n

Mode Redundancy
FAX relay 0
Modem pass-through 0
TDD/TTY US 3
Clear-channel n 0

The IP port networks utilize TN2602 Med's w/ up to date firmware. Any help or suggestions to fine tune this network would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

I should say we have a solid QoS implementation and plenty of bandwidth.
__________________
Stu
stubborne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 25th, 2007, 01:32 PM   #2 (permalink)
OctelWarrior
PBXtech SILVER 25+ posts
 
OctelWarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 62
OctelWarrior is on a distinguished road
Re: Faxing and IP Port Networks

First off you are using G729, this compresses the audio and you will lose some quality. I would recommend that any internal calls or calls between an IP endpoint and a local trunk use an uncompressed protocol, such as G.711. If these faxes are coming in on trunks local to the fax machine, you should be able to use an uncompressed codec, offering the best quality. If you are concerned with LAN bandwidth, you can assign all the IP phones to use G.729, but all other calls (fax/modem) would be G.711. There are a few ways to accomplish this depending on your situation.

Also, on page 3, Fax should be set to Pass-through. I don't remember which Avaya doc says this.
__________________
Peronally I'd rather lose phone access than data.
OctelWarrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisement
 
Advertisement
Sponsored links

Old January 26th, 2007, 09:19 AM   #3 (permalink)
oozenoz
PBXtech PLATINUM 300+ posts
 
oozenoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 350
oozenoz is on a distinguished road
Re: Faxing and IP Port Networks

Quote:
Originally Posted by stubborne View Post
Codec Suppression Per Pkt Size(ms)
1: G.729 n 2 20
2: G.729A n 2 20
3: G.711MU n 3 30
4:
5:
6:
7:
Am I reading this wrong or are you using a combination of A-law and mu-law companding...?
__________________
- calvin
oozenoz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2007, 08:38 AM   #4 (permalink)
stubborne
PBXtech PLATINUM 300+ posts
 
stubborne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 401
stubborne is on a distinguished road
Re: Faxing and IP Port Networks

Quote:
Originally Posted by oozenoz View Post
Am I reading this wrong or are you using a combination of A-law and mu-law companding...?
I had put the Alaw codec in awhile back (testing maybe?) but it's never used as MULAW is listed 1st on all codec set configs. I should remove it...

In response to the 1st poster, I will try passthru on fax but I don't get as much complaints or issues w/ faxing as I do with Modem. With Modem Passthru, it does not matter what codec you have config'd in the 1st page list, it will always use G.711 upon modem detection. I've traced calls and verified it does do that. I think the modem issues I was/am having are on the far-end devices (Cisco CallManager based)...

(edit: A-Law was added in support of codecs on adjunct devices, ie CallManager and others.. just haven't removed it)
__________________
Stu

Last edited by stubborne; January 30th, 2007 at 08:40 AM. Reason: can't remember anything
stubborne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 30th, 2007, 11:14 AM   #5 (permalink)
oozenoz
PBXtech PLATINUM 300+ posts
 
oozenoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 350
oozenoz is on a distinguished road
Re: Faxing and IP Port Networks

Companding should not be selected based on the type of device; it should be selected based on where the device is installed. mu-Law is NA standard, A-Law is ITU-T standard which is used just about everywhere else. If you are connecting to the PSTN in the US, you would have to use mu-Law because the two algorithms are not compatible - a connection where A-Law is used on the transmit side and mu-Law when received will result in a highly distorted signal after it is decoded and converted.

Best practice is to use the same companding for all traffic routing over a single interface.
__________________
- calvin
oozenoz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright ©2002 - 2007, PBXtech LLCAd Management by RedTyger

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36