![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
PBXtech SILVER 25+ posts
![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 45
![]() |
We are in a quandary:
We have heard advice from two different AVAYA Call Center Vector Programming sources about the necessity of having "Wait time 0 seconds hearing ringback" at the beginning of vectors, especially when they transfer off-PBX. We have also heard that we are wasting our time and should remove it from every vector. Anyone have experience in these matters? Thanks in advance. Melissa |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
PBXtech PLATINUM 300+ posts
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 354
![]() |
Re: Wait for ringback at beginning of vectors?
I don't know if this is life treatening or not, but I want I do know is that I use wait 2 sec hearing ringback at the begining of all my vectors, because I ususally have an announcement as the next step. The 2 seconds of ringback prevent the announcement from getting the beginning clipped off.
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
Sponsored links
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,351
![]() ![]() |
Re: Wait for ringback at beginning of vectors?
Quote:
When routing the vectors off-net: six of one, half a dozen of the other ... i.e. the statement should have no effect. As explained to me years ago by an old, crusty, AT&T engineer, the primary reason to use the "wait time" stetement at the begining of the vector is to insure the availability of system resources ... for instance, if you have an announcement step immediately following the "wait time" step and no announcement playback ports are available, the PBX will continue to execute the "wait time" step and play ringback to the caller until an announcement playback port becomes available rather than hitting the announcement step and simply failing and falling through to the next step. If you have the vector space, if you're not doing LAI or BSR, and if the "wait time" steps are already there and there's no known ill effects then LEAVE IT ALONE. This is one of those "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" things. The removal of all those steps will be time consuming and since you have to physically touch and alter each vector there is a potential for disaster. regs, .al.
__________________
Al Hays, ACE, MCSE, CCNA Homepage: http://www.jeral.com/ Training: http://www.jeral.com/avaya-learning.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,351
![]() ![]() |
Re: Wait for ringback at beginning of vectors?
Quote:
I really don't know why ... technically. I have a customer with an S8700 in Mumbai, India (I spent 3 weeks there ... but that's another story). All calls are queued stateside in one of two PBX's and then we use LAI to flow the calls to India when, and only when, an agent becomes available. The reason is to minimize traffic (including MOH and announcments) accross the compressed IP pipes carrying the traffic to Mumbai. We had fits with it when we first started testing. Being from the "old school" the SS used the "wait time" catch-all step as usual and once this step was removed everything began working fine. Bizzare ... and I wouldn't have believed it if I hadn't seen it myself. regs, .al.
__________________
Al Hays, ACE, MCSE, CCNA Homepage: http://www.jeral.com/ Training: http://www.jeral.com/avaya-learning.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 17
![]() |
Re: Wait for ringback at beginning of vectors?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
Sponsored links
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Estimated Wait Time | Bev Criswell | Definity Servers | 1 | August 31st, 2005 12:55 PM |
| Wait for Dial Tone | Andrew | Norstar systems | 0 | July 10th, 2003 05:58 PM |